facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast blog external search brokercheck brokercheck
%POST_TITLE% Thumbnail

The Strickland Decision, Part Deaux!

Military Pay and Benefits Retirement Funding Taxes

Special Tax Rules for Retired Military Members

While doing a presentation the other day, I received a question from one of the military members in the audience that made me think about the Strickland Decision and how it applies to military retirees who are 50% or more disabled.  Your tax consequences could vary quite a bit depending on how your offset is made up.  But we should start with a review

The Strickland Decision and IRR 78-161

The Strickland Decision is a result of a court case where a retired military member sued the IRS claiming the right to retroactively reduce his income by the amount of VA offset that should have been taken from his pay while his claim was being adjudicated.  He won.  The IRS agreed and implemented Internal Revenue Ruling (IRR) 78-161.  The ruling implements the court's decision.  You can read more about it here.

VA Offset

US Tax Code essentially states that you must reduce your retirement benefits by the amount of Veterans Administration (VA) Disability Compensation received.  Technically, this is the case for all veterans.  However, in 2004, the Congress changed the law to allow retired military members rated 50% or more disabled to receive both VA Disability Compensation and their full retirement pay.  This is call Concurrent Receipt and was fully implemented in 2014.  From a government accounting standpoint your military retirement pay is reduced by the VA Disability Compensation and all of it is replaced by Concurrent Disability and Retirement Pay (CRDP) or all or a portion of it is replaced by Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

CRDP vs. CRSC

Now, remember, we're talking government accounting here so logic doesn't necessarily apply. Key points...

  • Your retirement pay will be reduced by the amount of your VA benefit (even if you are 50% or more disabled)
  • If you are 50% or more disabled then the reduction will be replaced (in all or part) by CRDP or CRSC
  • CRDP will replace all of the reduction
  • CRSC will replace the portion of the reduction attributable to disability caused by combat or combat related activities.
  • CRSC is tax-free while CRDP is taxable.  If CRSC is selected, you are 50% or more disabled, and it applies to the time while the claim was being adjudicated, IRR 78-161 could apply.
  • CRDP will be put in place automatically while CRSC must be applied for with your Service

Financial Planning Opportunities for Retired Military Officers

First of all, if you are rated 50% or more disabled and your disabilities were caused by combat or combat related training, then you will want to check and see which puts the most money in your pocket...Tax-free CSRC for perhaps only a portion of your VA offset or taxable CRDP for the entire offset.  If you go the CRSC route check to see if the Strickland Decision applies.

If you are rated less than 50% disabled, then you might want to see if you qualify for CRSC to regain a portion of your VA offset.

In either case, you might want to meet with a Financial Advisor that specializes in working with retired military officers.


Disclaimer
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by C.L. Sheldon & Company, LLC ), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from C.L. Sheldon & Company, LLC . To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. C.L. Sheldon & Company, LLC is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the C.L. Sheldon & Company, LLC ’s current written disclosure statement discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. DISCLAIMER OF TAX ADVICE: Any discussion contained herein cannot be considered to be tax advice. Actual tax advice would require a detailed and careful analysis of the facts and applicable law, which we expect would be time consuming and costly. We have not made and have not been asked to make that type of analysis in connection with any advice given in this blog post. As a result, we are required to advise you that any Federal tax advice rendered in this blog is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS. In the event you would like us to perform the type of analysis that is necessary for us to provide an opinion, that does not require the above disclaimer, as always, please feel free to contact us.